<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Craig Russell Web n That &#187; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.craig-russell.co.uk/category/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.craig-russell.co.uk</link>
	<description>Web developement, identity management, federated access, web tech, geekery and the odd bit of paper folding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:57:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MP&#039;s Expenses Still Subject to FOI</title>
		<link>http://www.craig-russell.co.uk/mps-expenses-still-subject-to-foi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.craig-russell.co.uk/mps-expenses-still-subject-to-foi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craig-russell.co.uk/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days back I heard about the governments plans to exempt MP&#8217;s expenses from freedom of informatioin requests. They announced it last Thursday, sneakily hidden under the Heathrow third runway announcement. Anyway, I joined this Facebook Group, and send my MP (Patricia Hewett) this email&#8230; Monday 19 January 2009 Dear Patricia Hewitt, I&#8217;m writing&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days back I heard about the governments plans to exempt MP&#8217;s expenses from freedom of informatioin requests. They announced it last Thursday, sneakily hidden under the Heathrow third runway announcement.</p>
<p>Anyway, I joined this <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=50061011231">Facebook Group</a>, and send my MP (Patricia Hewett) this email&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Monday 19 January 2009</p>
<p>Dear Patricia Hewitt,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m writing to ask you to vote against the draft Freedom of Information<br />
(Parliament) Order 2009 this Thursday. I feel that an effective<br />
Parliament, which works for the the people, should be an open and<br />
transparent Parliament. I hope that you agree with me on this matter,<br />
and vote against the draft this Thursday.</p>
<p>Kindest regards</p>
<p>Craig Russell</p></blockquote>
<p>And sitting in my inbox this morning was her reply&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Dear Craig Russell,</p>
<p>Thank you for you email regarding the application of the Freedom of<br />
Information Act to MPs expenses.</p>
<p>I have always believed that we need to have greater openness and<br />
accountability about MPs&#8217; expenses. The proposals that the House will be<br />
voting on tomorrow will achieve these goals. In particular, they will<br />
give the public far more detail about expense claims than the present<br />
system and will establish a system of independent audit, including<br />
random checks, by the National Audit Office. I will therefore be<br />
supporting them.</p>
<p>I do not, however, believe that it is sensible or necessary for the<br />
House of Commons to check, scan and publish every single receipt for<br />
every single item of expenditure involved &#8211; which is what appears to be<br />
required by the recent decision in various Freedom of Information Act<br />
cases. However, the proposal not to apply the Freedom of Information Act<br />
to MPs&#8217; expenses has now apparently been withdrawn.</p>
<p>Thank you again for writing to me on this issue,</p>
<p>Yours sincerely</p>
<p>Patricia Hewitt</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s no &#8220;apparently&#8221; about it. The governemt has been given a bit of a rough time about the FOI exemption plans these past few days. And <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7842402.stm">yesterday they backed down</a> on that part of the proposal.</p>
<p>So &#8211; a good result really!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.craig-russell.co.uk/mps-expenses-still-subject-to-foi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

